Kosovo question still divides EU

When Kosovo declared independence in early 2008, the European Union faced a dilemma: Should the body recognize the formerly Serbian province as a sovereign state or not? Most EU member countries, including Germany, opted to do so.

Then-German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier explained the decision by saying Berlin "wanted to end the years-long lack of security and instability."

"Only that way could we set up a better future not just in Kosovo, but the entire western Balkans," he continued.

  Split weakens EU's approach

This split in the EU's approach to the question of Kosovo's independence weakens the body's position in the region. Ulrike Lunecek is an Austrian representative in the European Parliament, a member of the Green Party and rapporteur for Kosovo. She called "on the five recaltricant countries to recognize [Kosovo's independence], because that would make the EU's efforts more effective."

For the moment, that's not going to happen. The current, Cypriot head of the European Council's rotating presidency - who is opposed to Kosovo's independence - wants to keep a low profile on the issue.

Andreas Mavroyiannis, Cyprus' deputy minister for European affairs, said the EU is seeking a neutral approach to Kosovo's status.

But if the EU is taking an uneven approach to the issue, it can hardly wait for Serbia to officially give up Kosovo as part of its territory. Last June, Serbian President Tomislav Nikolic emerged satisfied from talks with European Council President Herman Van Rompuy and European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso.

"I have received the assurance that the EU will not demand we recognize Kosovo," Nikolic said.

For the Serbian leader, such a demand would be completely unacceptable. That's also how the large majority of the Serbian population and especially the Serbian minority in northern Kosovo also see things.

This does not mean that Brussels has no expectations for Serbia on the Kosovo question, especially when Belgrade wants to move closer to its goal of joining the EU. As of this year, Serbia is an official candidate for membership and is waiting for accession talks to begin.

  Dialogue and compromise as the 'European way'

Van Rompuy has spoken of a "European way of dialogue, compromise and consensus-seeking" as the way for both Kosovo and Serbia to win.

But European Parliament President Martin Schulz thinks in the long term, the question of Kosovo's status must be tackled.

In Brussels at the end of August, Serbian representative Suzana Grubjesic took a step even further, proposing "political dialogue on a higher level" with Kosovo.

Should the dialogue come, it certainly will not touch on the question of Kosovo's independence. There's been zero rapprochement between the two sides on the topic.

  International presence will long remain necessary

If the international civilian office in Kosovo's capital Pristina is shutting its doors, what will change? Not much, according to Marko Prelec, Balkans expert at the International Crisis Group in Brussels.

"Kosovo is still unstable, above all regarding the rule of law and relations with Serbs in the north of the country and in Serbia itself," he said.

Prelec added that for now, neither EU recognition of Kosovo's independence nor United Nations membership for the territory can be expected. He believes that any withdrawal of the international presence in Kosovo can only mean more danger for the Serbs there.

"This is still a dangerous region," Prelec said, "where the international presence will be further needed .

That's exactly how the EU and NATO see things. The NATO-led peacekeeping force KFOR, as well as the EU's policing and justice EULEX mission, are staying in Kosovo for now.